According to @MilkRoadDaily, an X post stated "so the thing about $ETH is..." and linked to a Justin Bieber status without providing any market data, price levels, or on-chain metrics (source: @MilkRoadDaily on X, Aug 17, 2025). For trading purposes, this isolated social mention does not constitute a verifiable entry or exit signal for Ethereum (ETH) and should not be acted upon without independent confirmation (source: @MilkRoadDaily on X, Aug 17, 2025; source: CFTC Customer Advisory: Beware Virtual Currency Pump-and-Dump Schemes, 2018). Best practice is to wait for corroboration from objective indicators rather than reacting to social buzz alone (source: CFTC Customer Advisory: Beware Virtual Currency Pump-and-Dump Schemes, 2018).

According to @FarsideUK, there are "juicy agreements in place," which they state is "a reason to buy the ETFs," indicating a bullish stance toward the referenced ETFs (source: Farside Investors on X, Aug 12, 2025). The call was amplified by a retweet from @BitMEXResearch, increasing visibility among crypto market participants (source: BitMEX Research retweet of Farside Investors, Aug 12, 2025). The tweet does not disclose details of the agreements, so the trading takeaway is a sentiment signal rather than a confirmed structural change (source: Farside Investors on X, Aug 12, 2025).

According to @Andre_Dragosch, a BTC retrace to $4,000 in the next bear market is unrealistic, as he publicly dismissed this scenario in an Aug 12, 2025 post addressing @HenrikZeberg (source: @Andre_Dragosch on X, Aug 12, 2025). The post explicitly rejects the $4k downside case for BTC without providing supporting charts, data, timing, or alternative levels, framing the debate around whether such an extreme drawdown should be considered in risk scenarios (source: @Andre_Dragosch on X, Aug 12, 2025).